Hello Dudes!
Yesterday I find Quality Porn Pay ystem. You can buy 3 Days Full Access to see 20 quality porn sites only for 1 $!!! If you buy access more then 3, you can see near 50 porn sites!!!!
These Niched Porn Sites:
Bust A Nut On A Slut
All Cum Tour
Candy Black Ass
College Teen Creamers
Corporate Fantasy
Cream Filled Models
Cum And Ass
Cum On Big Boobs
Euro Bang Babes
EuroSoftBabes
I Love To Squirt
Indian Booty Hunters
Kiss My Crack
MilfPornPass
Mom Loves Cum
NichedSitesPass
Party Hard Whores
Plaster Her
RealHotIndianGirls
Sexy Lesbian Affairs
Sexy Teens Big Cocks
Smack That Slut

It’s not often that 150 students gather to hear adult film stars talk about sex, but the Stanford-hosted event “Backstage with the Porn Stars” did just that — brought X-rated movie actors Richard Pacheco and Nina Hartley to Cubberley Auditorium Saturday evening.

The event, co-sponsored by the Queer Straight Alliance, the LGBT-CRC and the ASSU Speakers Bureau, served as a fundraiser for the Tenderloin AIDS Foundation of San Francisco.

“The subject tonight is sex,” Pacheco declared bluntly at the beginning of the talk.

The speakers recalled their experiences in the industry with candor and, at times, self-deprecation. Their language was colorful and unapologetic. To kick off the event, Pacheco led the audience in a repetition of call-and-response, beginning with the words “zipper,” “bra” and “bosom,” and moving on to increasingly risque vocabulary.

“If you don’t like colored language, you should probably get the fuck out now,” he said, drawing laughter from the crowd.

Pacheco informed the audience that porn stars aren’t that different from everyone else. He told of his first audition and meeting with his potential co-stars.

“I wanted some of those bad girls I’d heard so much about,” he said. But after getting to know them, he said he realized “there are no X-rated people. It’s just us.”

Hartley gave advice to the girls seeking male attention.

“Men are visual,” she said. Joking that “the feminist police are going to shoot me,” she advised women in the audience to learn to walk in high heels and swing their hips.

“When it’s time for sex it’s okay to act sexist,” she continued.

But the stars primarily preached a message of acceptance and safe sex.

“It’s okay to like whatever it is you like,” Hartley said, cautioning: “Negotiate your behavior… You have to set limits and stick to them even when you feel aroused. You have to keep yourself safe.”

After speaking for more than an hour-and-a-half, Hartley and Pacheco took questions dealing with sex workers’ rights, pornography’s relation to violence against women and AIDS.

Asked about what should be done to combat the dangers prostitutes face in their line of work, Hartley argued, “The most important thing for sex worker rights is decriminalization,” and noted that prostitutes in dangerous situations currently cannot turn to the authorities for fear of being arrested.

Hartley also took issue with anti-porn feminists who seek to regulate adult entertainment and who argue that pornography causes misogyny, stating, “I don’t agree with their position that porn endangers women.”

“Sex begets sex, violence begets violence,” she said. “[Violence against women] is not the fault of porn; it is a reaction in the culture to repression.”

Hartley admitted, “There is plenty of distasteful stuff out there that I wouldn’t watch,” but both actors argued against federal content regulations.

The stars also described their respective responses to the first heterosexual transmission of AIDS in 1984.

Pacheco withdrew from the industry after hearing the news, while Hartley remained active, saying, “Risk reduction was fine with me.”

She explained that the modern porn industry requires monthly STD checks for its employees and that actors are actually safer than the general population despite the fact that only 20 percent of porn films feature condoms.

Event sponsors were pleased with the talk, which raised about $410 for the AIDS foundation, said Katy Yan, president of the QSA.

Megan Kelso, a senior whose friendship with Pacheco’s daughter prompted her to organize the event at Stanford, said she was pleased with the way the speakers handled the subject matter.

“I thought that the show was very uplifting, with little gems of wisdom that the speakers bestowed on us occasionally,” Kelso told the Daily. “I was happy that Richard and Nina didn’t dwell on serious issues and yet didn’t avoid them either.”

“The audience that was there seemed to have enjoyed themselves a great deal and got a lot out of the evening’s discussions,” Yan said. “People stayed to chat with the speakers and left talking about the topics raised, and that’s the best result that I could have expected.”

“We’re very happy to have sponsored this event,” agreed Adam Kahn, a master’s student in communication and director of the Speakers Bureau.

Asked why he attended, freshman Michael Hudson replied, “It was kind of a novelty thing to go to a talk by ex-porn stars, and also it was for a good cause.

“They were encouraging more sexual freedom, and as porn stars, of course they’d be saying that,” Hudson continued. “But there’s something to what they’re saying. How can sex be evil and why do we have to repress it, if without it we wouldn’t exist?”

http://daily.stanford.edu/tempo?page=content&id=20077&repository=0001_article

Written by Kelly Fisher, senior writer

Singer and songwriter Meredith LeVande made her Virginia college debut in the Wilson Hall Auditorium Monday night delivering her lecture, “Women, Pop Music and Pornography,” in which she discussed the increase of sexual images in pop music.

LeVande, who has a degree in women’s studies from the University of Rochester, has been touring college campuses for several years, lecturing on the link between pop music and pornography. As a female musician, LeVande said she wanted “to promote the awareness of pornography in pop music.”

Through the use of a PowerPoint presentation, music video clips and advertisements, LeVande demonstrated the pervasiveness of pornographic images in society.

She related the incessant sexual images seen on MTV, billboards and in magazine ads to pornographic images that used to be taboo. In turn, scantily clad stars end up selling their bodies and sex appeal in a pornographic fashion. These images don’t even faze the common adult anymore — it has become the standard, according to LeVande.

“These images are the same ones you see every day at supermarkets,” LeVande said of the sexual pictures of pop stars such as Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera.

“How we define pornography has remained the same, but our exposure has increased,” LeVande said. “Nudity is the norm.”

The corporate world also plays a role in the increase of sexual images in mainstream society. Media giants, such as Viacom and News Corp., have major investments in the pornography industry.

“One of the few things that America makes is porn,” LeVande said. “Media giants’ economic interests lie in making porn acceptable.”

The portrayal of young pop stars as sex symbols leads to a conformed social image of women, according to LeVande, thus leading to “the dumbing-down of women.”

“A specific, homogenized image of women has filled our airways,” LeVande said.

After her lecture, a question-and-answer session took place between LeVande and the audience. She ended her presentation by singing songs from her two released albums.

Many students in the audience reacted to the lecture.

“Seeing the presentation where she showed pictures of pop stars and compared their pictures to porn was really eye-opening,” said sophomore Rebecca O’Dell. “It made me see that that there isn’t really that much of a difference between the two.”

Junior James Styron agreed with LeVande’s comments about the link between pop stars and pornography.

“The presentation speaks to an issue we’re all aware of but are scared to touch,” said Styron. “LeVande shows us that not all artists must sell their sex to play music, but if they want to make it into the spotlight and stay there for any significant amount of time, they will have to conform in some way to the heterosexual male’s world of corporate-sponsored sex.”

The University Program Board sponsored LeVande’s presentation. For more information about LeVande, go to meredithlevande.com.

After Marcel Duchamp’s urinal, Piero Manzoni’s canned faeces and Tracey Emin’s bed, you might have thought shock tactics in the art world had gone about as far as they could.

But the Toilet Gallery in Kingston has stepped into the fray with My Vanilla Life - a controversial series of images taken at the moment of the subjects’ orgasm.

They are the work of Kingston photographer Derek Mossop who found his models by placing an advertisement in Time Out magazine two years ago. He said a variety of people responded, from pole dancers to a 76-year-old chorister.

He said the resulting images had an affinity with scenes of religious rapture by Renaissance artists such as Rubens, Titian and Michaelangelo.

“I hope the pictures raise more questions than they answer,” said Mr Mossop, a former Kingston College student.

“They have a precedent in classical and religious imagery and aim to pose questions about issues of sexual identity and the nature of human existence.

“I am interested in how we define ourselves. The orgasm is such a powerful force, it is worth exploring, because during a brief moment of ecstasy, the world falls away and the mind is silent.”

Each photo has a standard format, capturing the pose and expression of each participant from the chest up, against a black background. Mr Mossop said this gave the sequence the flavour of a semi-scientific experiment, which attempted to freeze a fleeting moment.

He said: “Most photos in magazines are not art, just expensive wallpaper. But I want these photos to open up a debate about whether it is possible to get beyond the surface and hopefully they will make people think.”

Mr Mossop recently had an exhibition at central London’s National Portrait Gallery.

In Gods Name was a series of photographs portraying post-September 11 America.

The Toilet Gallery, curated by Paul Stafford, director of foundation studies in Art & Design at Kingston University, was opened in October 2003 by seminal British artists, Gilbert & George.

# The show runs from Friday, April 7, to Friday, April 28, at The Toilet Gallery, 151 Clarence St, Kingston, open Wednesdays to Fridays, 1pm to 6pm, Saturdays, 10am to 6pm and Sundays, 1pm to 5pm. For more information, go to: www.toiletgallery.org

Students experienced multiple orgasms outside the Reitz Union on Wednesday, thanks to a little help from the Pride Student Union.

PSU invited participants to showcase this typically private occurrence on T-shirts in the first-ever Paint Your Orgasm as part of Pride Awareness Month.

The event intended to educate people about sexual health and safety, said event director Ricky Cortez. PSU adopted the idea from other colleges across the nation.

“We want to break that taboo with sexuality whether you’re gay, straight or on the fringes,” Cortez said. “It’s not something you normally talk about. When you see a shirt with ‘My orgasm is …’ on it, it gets attention.”

Pride Awareness Month provided materials, including 150 white T-shirts and colorful tubes of paint, which allowed students to paint shirts for free. They also had the option of decorating construction paper.

“We’re going to make sure we give every T-shirt out and that every one has an orgasm on it,” Cortez said. He added they would get more shirts if necessary.

Because coordinators wanted to integrate more than painting, they teamed up with UF organization Vox: Voices for Planned Parenthood, which provided condoms, pamphlets and other sexual information. A Planned Parenthood representative attended to address any questions or concerns.

UF student and Vox member Jackie Brenner decorated a T-shirt with glitter and paint.

“I’m painting a woman’s body with the beauty of an orgasm radiating through her,” Brenner said. “That’s what I’m calling it: Radiation of Beauty.”

http://www.alligator.org/pt2/060406orgasm.php

I’ve always been somewhat dubious about the authenticity of telephone sex surveys.

“Hello sir, I’d like to ask you some questions about your sex life. Like how often do you have sex in a week? Twice a day? Right. Thank you.”

Surely asking about someone’s sex life over the phone can lead to exaggeration (mostly men) and reluctance or understating (mostly women). The result is misleading information, deliberate or not.

That being said, there are, of course, some sex surveys that tell us fascinating details and facts about our sex lives, and survey companies will swear their results are correct to within a small percentage.

My scepticism extends also to university studies on sexuality done by phone survey. Odd conclusions can be had from such studies because of a wide variety of factors and the angle of questioning.

A case in point is a recent study on sex toys conducted by the University of Michigan School of Public Health. They claim it is the “first research study done on sex toys.”

However, the startling conclusions they came to from this study was that people who use sex toys are more likely to engage in high-risk sexual behaviour, including the use of recreational drugs for sexual enhancement and non-monogamous sex and also have more sexually transmitted diseases.

Do what? How did they come up such a sweeping and disturbing idea?

For a start, how did the survey work? The researchers say they interviewed 1,114 sexually active people, but how many people did they have to go through before they found those willing to discuss their sex toy use on the phone with a total stranger?

Taken from http://www.torontosun.com/Lifestyle/2006/04/04/1519101-sun.html